<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New source of water in Griffith Park! (Hands OFF, LADWP.)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://donnabarstow.com/park_blog/2008/09/24/new-source-of-water-in-griffith-park-hands-off-ladwp/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://donnabarstow.com/park_blog/2008/09/24/new-source-of-water-in-griffith-park-hands-off-ladwp/</link>
	<description>Griffith Park and Silver Lake, Fire and Water.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2010 19:00:27 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Donna Barstow</title>
		<link>http://donnabarstow.com/park_blog/2008/09/24/new-source-of-water-in-griffith-park-hands-off-ladwp/comment-page-1/#comment-5760</link>
		<dc:creator>Donna Barstow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 09:08:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donnabarstow.com/park_blog/2008/09/24/new-source-of-water-in-griffith-park-hands-off-ladwp/#comment-5760</guid>
		<description>Hi, Jessica, good point. I never heard of a headcut before, but every possible source of water in the Park should be nurtured. And restored before they became a problem.

Probably Tom LaBonge would be the first step. My very first complaint about the park is that there is NO coordinating position or department to look at the park as a WHOLE natural landscape. Maybe a ranger would report this, maybe not. The horrible tree cutters are unqualified and a joke.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, Jessica, good point. I never heard of a headcut before, but every possible source of water in the Park should be nurtured. And restored before they became a problem.</p>
<p>Probably Tom LaBonge would be the first step. My very first complaint about the park is that there is NO coordinating position or department to look at the park as a WHOLE natural landscape. Maybe a ranger would report this, maybe not. The horrible tree cutters are unqualified and a joke.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jessica Hall</title>
		<link>http://donnabarstow.com/park_blog/2008/09/24/new-source-of-water-in-griffith-park-hands-off-ladwp/comment-page-1/#comment-5753</link>
		<dc:creator>Jessica Hall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 00:18:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://donnabarstow.com/park_blog/2008/09/24/new-source-of-water-in-griffith-park-hands-off-ladwp/#comment-5753</guid>
		<description>Hi,
This is very interesting.  A couple of things - there are lots of streams in Griffith Park, just mostly intermittent or ephemeral throughout the year.  But still very important from a habitat standpoint.  

They also need restoration themselves - some are compromised by checkdams, lining in concrete, etc.  One that I have seen has a large headcut traveling up it, which could eventually undermine a road.  I would hope that situations like that would get priority for natural restoration, rather than emergency repairs that end up lining it with more concrete.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,<br />
This is very interesting.  A couple of things &#8211; there are lots of streams in Griffith Park, just mostly intermittent or ephemeral throughout the year.  But still very important from a habitat standpoint.  </p>
<p>They also need restoration themselves &#8211; some are compromised by checkdams, lining in concrete, etc.  One that I have seen has a large headcut traveling up it, which could eventually undermine a road.  I would hope that situations like that would get priority for natural restoration, rather than emergency repairs that end up lining it with more concrete.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
